<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: view from a room</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.haverford.edu/amongfriends/2009/01/23/view-from-a-room/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.haverford.edu/amongfriends/2009/01/23/view-from-a-room/</link>
	<description>2009 Mellon Symposium</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 08:59:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.haverford.edu/amongfriends/2009/01/23/view-from-a-room/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.haverford.edu/blogs/amongfriends/?p=359#comment-60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i like this, cubby. i like your suggestion (i think you&#039;re suggesting this) that there is danger in appropriating chef&#039;s look, which as you&#039;re saying is kind of easy to do. i&#039;m wondering where we could locate that danger. i don&#039;t want to be overbearingly simple-minded about this, but i still want to ask the question: what is a fat black chef guardian angel? 
and then i have this other question: maybe are you identifying the danger of adopting the chef&#039;s look? is it because the look belongs to something racist? maybe it&#039;s just scary that we&#039;re trying to find a point of view in an object with racist cultural trappings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like this, cubby. i like your suggestion (i think you&#8217;re suggesting this) that there is danger in appropriating chef&#8217;s look, which as you&#8217;re saying is kind of easy to do. i&#8217;m wondering where we could locate that danger. i don&#8217;t want to be overbearingly simple-minded about this, but i still want to ask the question: what is a fat black chef guardian angel?<br />
and then i have this other question: maybe are you identifying the danger of adopting the chef&#8217;s look? is it because the look belongs to something racist? maybe it&#8217;s just scary that we&#8217;re trying to find a point of view in an object with racist cultural trappings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cubby</title>
		<link>http://blogs.haverford.edu/amongfriends/2009/01/23/view-from-a-room/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>cubby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.haverford.edu/blogs/amongfriends/?p=359#comment-58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chef seems to do play two parts in the kitchen:  

1.  lucky charm  -  to enhance cooking
2.  be the eyes that give a new view - this one sounds abstract, but when i look at Chef in these first two pictures, the way I look at the final picture of the kitchen is altered - i adopt his perspective - so i think he is there for people to put themselves in his shoes -- it reminds me of how often my family sits around and looks at my cat looking at us in our kitchen - i think part of the fun of having him around is to remind us of another completely different lifestyle (extremely difft lifestyle... a different species ) in the context of our most domestic moments -- we think, &#039;gee, i wonder what robie must think of this&#039; and we have fun imagining for each other captions for his expressive gestures of reaction.  are house pets just around to react to human behavior?   
anyway 

I wonder - are chef&#039;s two roles so distinct?  How does chef&#039;s blessing connect to his watching?  

might the notion of &#039;watching over,&#039;  inhabit a relational space between blessing/protecting/charming and eying?
we&#039;ve all heard of guardian angels, but it is interesting to imagine what can be contributed by simply gazing on.  i spend much time thinking about the dangers of looking - to me, not all image/video sharing is to be celebrated - i think a lot about dangers of appropriation.  but chef&#039;s angelic presence reminds me more of something like jane jacob&#039;s &quot;eyes on the street.&quot; for chef and for jacobs, eyes are on shared physical space -- does this transfer to cyber space?  i feel like the rules change, you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chef seems to do play two parts in the kitchen:  </p>
<p>1.  lucky charm  &#8211;  to enhance cooking<br />
2.  be the eyes that give a new view &#8211; this one sounds abstract, but when i look at Chef in these first two pictures, the way I look at the final picture of the kitchen is altered &#8211; i adopt his perspective &#8211; so i think he is there for people to put themselves in his shoes &#8212; it reminds me of how often my family sits around and looks at my cat looking at us in our kitchen &#8211; i think part of the fun of having him around is to remind us of another completely different lifestyle (extremely difft lifestyle&#8230; a different species ) in the context of our most domestic moments &#8212; we think, &#8216;gee, i wonder what robie must think of this&#8217; and we have fun imagining for each other captions for his expressive gestures of reaction.  are house pets just around to react to human behavior?<br />
anyway </p>
<p>I wonder &#8211; are chef&#8217;s two roles so distinct?  How does chef&#8217;s blessing connect to his watching?  </p>
<p>might the notion of &#8216;watching over,&#8217;  inhabit a relational space between blessing/protecting/charming and eying?<br />
we&#8217;ve all heard of guardian angels, but it is interesting to imagine what can be contributed by simply gazing on.  i spend much time thinking about the dangers of looking &#8211; to me, not all image/video sharing is to be celebrated &#8211; i think a lot about dangers of appropriation.  but chef&#8217;s angelic presence reminds me more of something like jane jacob&#8217;s &#8220;eyes on the street.&#8221; for chef and for jacobs, eyes are on shared physical space &#8212; does this transfer to cyber space?  i feel like the rules change, you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
